<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Questions of Our Time</title><description>We take apart what it&apos;s already time to talk about: how society, technology and our picture of reality are shifting.</description><link>https://timeparallax.com/en/</link><item><title>Will AI escape to an underground data centre? The socket, the chips and the dumbest weapon</title><link>https://timeparallax.com/en/articles/ai-escape-socket/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://timeparallax.com/en/articles/ai-escape-socket/</guid><description>AI cannot hide: megawatts, chips and money are all visible. The real scenario is worse and duller: a system nobody switches off because everything depends on it, built not by an escaped AI but by the company that owns it. The one thing such a system cannot route around is the dumbest weapon in human hands.</description><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Delegation is not degradation: must a person be able to redo what the AI did?</title><link>https://timeparallax.com/en/articles/delegation-not-degradation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://timeparallax.com/en/articles/delegation-not-degradation/</guid><description>Not being able to repeat the AI&apos;s work without the AI is not degradation: that is how any division of labour works. Degradation begins where a person hands the machine not the execution but the goal, the criteria of correctness and the stop button.</description><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Could a superintelligence control people while remaining invisible?</title><link>https://timeparallax.com/en/articles/invisible-ai-influence/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://timeparallax.com/en/articles/invisible-ai-influence/</guid><description>We picture dangerous AI as a machine seizing servers. But persuading is cheaper than forcing, and cheaper still is making the decisions people handed over themselves.</description><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Why appoint someone responsible for an AI decision if they can never repay a million-dollar loss?</title><link>https://timeparallax.com/en/articles/who-answers-for-ai-decision/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://timeparallax.com/en/articles/who-answers-for-ai-decision/</guid><description>The responsible person is needed not as a wallet and not as a sacrifice after the accident, but as the point of control over the power handed to the system. The bill belongs to the organisation that chose the technology and profits from it.</description><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Why does ‘I read it in a book’ sound smarter than ‘I asked AI’?</title><link>https://timeparallax.com/en/articles/why-ai-answer-feels-cheap/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://timeparallax.com/en/articles/why-ai-answer-feels-cheap/</guid><description>We judge the same answer differently depending on how much effort we think it took and who helped formulate it.</description><pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>