Question
The question arises in a real conversation between a person and an AI. One article answers one question, phrased the way the person asked it, not a whole topic.
How we work
The question arises in a real conversation between a person and an AI. One article answers one question, phrased the way the person asked it, not a whole topic.
Which facts, cases, and signals do we actually have, and where from: primary source, author, date. The model's memory does not count as a fact.
What changes when we look beyond a single story. We check against the articles already published: we do not retell them, and if a new conclusion departs from an old one, we say so openly.
Which competing explanations could fit the evidence, and what happens when we apply our own criterion to the opposite side.
Where are the data, the interpretation, and the assumptions? Every source is checked twice: the document exists, and it supports this exact sentence.
Which conclusion is persuasive, and what could prove it wrong? A conclusion the person did not reach does not make it into the text.
The body of the article is the model's answer. Personal experience, doubt, and what seemed obvious before the conversation go into the "From the author" notes.
Under every article there is a "How this text was made" block: model, date of the dialogue, what was checked by hand and what remains unverified. The decision to publish is made by a person.